I read an article recently about a famous Evangelical leader who
was being parodied as appealing to men to be more alpha. In the
satirical piece, he was quoted as saying, “The
problem with our churches today is that the lead pastor is some sissy
boy who wears cardigan sweaters, has The Carpenters dialed in on his
iPod, gets his hair cut at a salon instead of a barber shop, hasn’t been
to an Ultimate Fighting match, works out on an elliptical machine
instead of going to isolated regions of Russia like in Rocky IV in order to harvest lumber with his teeth, and generally swishes around like Jack from Three’s Company whenever Mr. Roper was around.”
The article went on to poke fun at men who bash on guys who don't spend
every waking moment doing "masculine" things like changing the oil,
watching football, beating their bare chest in front of the latest UFC
166,
or Muy Thai stick fighting. There's a crisis in the church today;
we have a skewed understanding of true masculinity, which this article
highlighted by exaggerating some of the views that are out there.
I believe in men being masculine, but we would be wise
to find out what truly makes a man masculine? From examining scripture, I
have four observations.
1. We need a healthy balanced definition of Masculinity. Webster defines the word masculine as "having qualities appropriate to or usually associated with a man."
It is also defined as "courageous, bold, or strong." Nothing about
violence, machismo, or emotional distance, which some of these
aforementioned activities can involve. Do we need macho guys in the
pulpit or men who are connected to their families, and wives in
particular. I have found that even the act of watching football can
isolate me for a complete weekend (not to mention Thursday and Monday
night). Some wives are virtually widowed in the Fall; I call them
"football widows." Is masculinity now equated with violence such as
UFC, and football? Both of these have made me more violent over the
years (and I have played football for 10 years of my life). Jesus shows
us true masculinity. The scriptures say about Jesus in Isaiah 53:9, "He
had done NO VIOLENCE, and there was no deceit in his mouth." The scriptures also talk about doing violence to our wives in Malachi 2:16. The
prophet says, "The man who hates and divorces his wife," says the Lord,
The God of Israel, "Does violence to the one he should protect," says
the Lord almighty. So be on your guard, and do not be unfaithful."
Could unfaithfulness include loving a sport or hobby more than our
spouse? I think there should be a healthy balance of strength, and
boldness, kindness, and tenderness in the biblical definition of
masculinity, rather than the masculinity litmus test being your ability
to bash someone's face in on UFC 166. Here are some other scriptures for
your perusal: Ps. 11:5, Pr. 13:2, Is. 59:7, Matt. 11:12, Jer. 22:3; Ps 119:37.
2. Men in ministry need to
be spirit filled and humble. We don't need men in ministry who are more
effeminate; we don't need "studs" either. I remember years ago our
student ministry decided to stop attending a very popular camp with our
students because of this very issue. We attended this camp for years,
and then as I began looking around at their staff, they were all studs
and studdettes. There was not one minority, disabled, unattractive, or
"un-cool" person on their staff from year to year. It was an unreal
picture of the kingdom of God. Jesus ministered to the odd, hurting,
needy, marginalized, leprous. He reached prostitutes, people with
disabilities, the sick, and tax-collectors. It also seems like the biblical
definition of the 'elder' or 'overseer' seems to fly in the face of what
I am going to call the "new evangelical masculinity." I would actually
consider this definition the height of masculinity. In 1 Timothy 3:1-7,
Paul writes that a church leader "must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, prudent, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not addicted to wine or pugnacious, but gentle, peaceable,
free from the love of money. He must be one who manages his own
household well, keeping his children under control with all dignity (but
if a man does not know how to manage his own household, how will he
take care of the church of God?), and not a new convert, so that he will
not become conceited and fall into the condemnation incurred by the
devil. And he must have a good reputation with those outside the
church, so that he will not fall into reproach and the snare of the
devil." This passage seems to be the antithesis of the description of
manliness that we're hearing from several evangelical church leaders
lately.
3. We need leaders whose masculinity is evidenced in part by their transformational ministry. Transformational
leaders are connected emotionally (to people and the Lord). They feel
deeply, act deeply, and worship affectionately. Men, where is your
affection for the savior? We go to concerts and get crazy, or a baseball
game, or for that matter play video games for countless hours, but
where is our excitement to worship Christ? A.W. Tozer said, "Any man
(or woman) who is bored or turned off by worship is not ready for
heaven." So my question to you is not, Are you a masculine leader? But, do you have a living, humble, needy, celebratory, affectionate,
meditative, worshipful, loving, and tender, communion with Christ? If
so, you are masculine by his standards. If we say No to any of these
things, and say "I'm not a very emotional person" then we may need to
examine our hearts. We need to pray and ask him to change us into a
emotionally connected servant leaders, like Jesus our master. I'll give
you a few instances of how our master was compassionate, affectionate
and emotional: Matthew 14:10-18; Matthew 20:30-34; Mark 8:1-6; Luke 7:12-15; Philippians 2:1-3; Matthew 9:36-38; Mark 1:40-42; Mark 6:34; John 11:32-38; Luke 19:36-41; James 4:9, 10; Matthew 13:15; I Thessalonians 2:1-19.
4. We need men who serve
faithfully rather than seeking to be superstars in the church. For example, we don't
need more multi-site churches beaming sermons into their venue via
satellite. As we're seeking to lead other men, we can give them
opportunities to lead and invest in them. We can give them feedback and encourage
them when they take those opportunities. They will speak with their
feet and walk out the door if we don't provide opportunities to express their pastoral gifting in this way. We
need more men of average intelligence, and average teaching skills, to
be preaching the not-so-average gospel in the not-so-average power of
the Holy Spirit! Our men need to be empowered through training and
service. The "big ministry" and personality-centered ministry
concept gives young men the impression that if they have only 200 or fewer people in
their church, they're not adequate or successful in ministry. Success
is not how many butts are in our seats. There are so many men out there
who appear "average" in other people's estimation, but they're not
average because they minister week in, and week out in the Holy
Spirit's power!
In conclusion, I wholly
disagree that the problem with the church today is not enough
"masculine" men in ministry; we don't have enough men who call on the
name of the best man in all of human history, the most humane and mighty
man, Jesus. No, not the most interesting man in the world from the Dos
Equis commercials.
No, "that one," the one who did seemingly
un-masculine things. He let evil men savagely disfigure him by beating
him in the face and pulling his beard, the symbol of a Jewish man's
masculinity. He then let them put him on a cruel cross to do the most
masculine act in all of history! He took responsibility! He took
responsibility for your sin and mine. That man is the ultimate measure
of masculinity. May we all as men measure up to that man Christ, "who
emptied himself taking the form of a bond-servant; and being made in the
likeness of men, being found in appearance as a man, he humbled Himself
by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross."
Can we all follow the example of Christ? Then and only then will we
measure up as masculine men, and if that isn't very masculine in our
culture, then I'm not masculine, and I don't want to be. I want to be
like Christ!
By all accounts Jesus should not have even been born! Let me clarify by all human accounts Jesus should not have been born. First, in a highly religious community a young teenage girl who was engaged and practically married is found out to be pregnant. Second her husband, or future husband finds out. No this isn't an episode of 'teen mom' on MTV it's the story of Jesus becoming a baby. We know that Jesus was even considered illegitimate by the community in which he lived and ministered because they said about him, "isn't this Mary's son?"(Mark 6:3) Third in that seriously religious community the penalty for fornication or adultery was death by stoning (Deuteronomy 22:22). Mary should have and would have been stoned typically in that day and age. In this 'legal system' a woman found to be with child would be stoned, and baby, and mother killed. In our modern day and age however a same scenario with a super religious family might just abort the baby. It happens more often than you might think (More than 7 in 10 U.S. women obtaining an abortion report a religious affiliation 37% protestant, 28% Catholic and 7% other Guttmacher Institute)
Yes, Christmas is just. It is God's ultimate act of Justice. It is God weaving an incredible story to appease his own wrath in Jesus. Christmas is God fulfilling his demand for justice in Jesus' manger, righteous life, substitutionary cross, and victorious resurrection for you and me. This Christmas I rest in the justice of God, and that His righteous and just requirement is met in that little manger scene when God became man.
